|
EOLECTRICITY = ECONOMY + EMPLOYMENT + ENVIRONMENT
by Peter Moss
Most Vermont candidates talked about creating jobs and growing the "free-market"
economy and of course preserving environmental quality. Unfortunately,
job creation verbiage consisted mainly of luring employers from other
states by "improving the business climate," meaning tax giveaways, environmental
leniency, and building the Circumferential Highway. Nobody said that growing
unemployment is a national problem due to national policies of exporting
good jobs and always maintaining surplus labor to control unions. Notable
and completely absent were suggestion of really new industries, to be
created and operated by the State of Vermont. Now I would like to propose
a genuinely new set of industries based on eolectricity or wind mill driven
turbine generated electricity. Aeolus was the Greeks' god of wind who
gives us this free, clean, inexhaustible and peaceful energy bounty and
the extra "o" in his kind of electricity recognizes Aeolus. All current
"renewable" fuels (ethanol, wood, biodiesel) burn to CO2, the main green
house gas causing global warming, plus some CO which kills if the garage
is not open. Presidential candidate and ex-Governor Dean says: "We gave
a ton of oil money to the Saudis. The Saudis used some of our money to
buy off their religious radicals and pay for the madrasas, the Islamic
fundamentalist schools which teach people to hate Christians, Jews and
Americans. Those are the recruiting grounds for Osama bin Laden," said
Dr. Dean. And it's all happening, he declared, "because we don't have
a decent renewable energy policy in this country and we need one." The
problem is much bigger than renewability. We have a 275-year U.S. coal
reserve so renewability is not the main problem. If it was, we could fire
locomotives and Stanley Steamers with coal and after A.D. 2300, replace
coal with wood. The corn based ethanol interests have successfully confused
the issue and hope to replace carbon containing fossil fuels with carbon
containing "renewable" ethanol-from-corn which not only adds to pollution
and global warming but must be blended with gasoline so it only reduces
oil consumption and only delays oil wars, but it does not address the
more difficult environmental problems. The most urgent problem at this
writing is the imminent oil war against Iraq, but that is not because
of any fuel shortage. The war is instigated by the transnational oil corporation
executives who want to control Saddam instead of Saddam having any say
in their business. Fortunately there is eolectricity and hydrogen but
politicians in elections are interested only in winning, not in solving
real problems. In a column titled Hydrogen, Not Fossil Fuels, I noted
that BMW and other car makers have hydrogen cars on the road. Hydrogen
is made from water and burns to water. A more inexhaustible fuel supply
is unimaginable. More importantly, it is completely non-polluting: hydrogen
car exhaust is at times cleaner than ambient air in Los Angeles. No air
pollution, no global warming, no kidding. And needless to say, the Saudis,
Iraq, Colombia and Venezuela have not cornered the world supply of water
nor the world market for hydrogen. Wind mills coupled to generators already
produce some eolectricity which can be used to electrolyze water to hydrogen
and oxygen, each of which can be cryogenically liquefied and sold in insulated
containers. We have current technology to replace gasoline and diesel
cars, home heating propane tanks, diesel locomotives, and eventually we
will fly hydrogen propelled airplanes (not hydrogen filled dirigibles).
BMW actually has dual fuel cars using gasoline by the flick of a switch
when out of reach of a hydrogen service station. But of course Detroit
and other car makers are not ready to retool until they must. In the meantime
we have oil wars, pollution and global warming, and dangerous old nukes
whose license renewals should be denied before another Chernobyl. Vermont
could grow its economy and create jobs if it would formulate a state program
to manufacture wind mill generators and install them on well-chosen mountain
peaks. Vermont could replace fossil and nuke generators, while saving
consumers money and eliminating pollution. Excess eolectricity not needed
in the power grid can be used to electrolyze water, cryogenically separate
hydrogen and oxygen, and distribute the hydrogen through existing service
stations. A second part of this state owned program would be a hydrogen
pump and tank manufacturing and installation subsidiary. And a third part
would be a subsidiary to develop retrofit kits to convert existing cars
to dual fuel, then manufacture and install the kits. If Vermont goes eolectric
and hydrogen, could Detroit and the U.S.A. lag far behind? A conversion
tax to speed the program would tax fossil & nuke profits to help finance
the program but it would have to be used judiciously to promote economic
growth, full employment, and the elimination of global warming pollutants.
A better world can be legislated with a little Yankee ingenuity to plan
for it. Mr. Moss, a licensed professional engineer, was a technical advisor
to the U.S. EPA for 14 years and is currently the only Vermont certified
candidate for the U. S. Senate in 2004.
|